An anonymous reader writes “Computer science professor Daniel Lemire explains why spreadsheets shouldn’t be used for important work, especially where dedicated software could do a better job. His post comes in response to evaluations of a new economics tome by Thomas Piketty, a book that is likely to be influential for years to come. Lemire writes, ‘Unfortunately, like too many people, Piketty used
speadsheets instead of writing sane software. On the plus side, he published his code on the negative side, it appears that Piketty’s code contains mistakes, fudging and other problems. … Simply put, spreadsheets are good for quick and dirty work, but they are not designed for serious and reliable work. … Spreadsheets make code review difficult. The code is hidden away in dozens if not hundreds of little cells If you are not reviewing your code carefully and if you make it difficult for others to review it, how do expect it to be reliable?'”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.