Episode 1013: Chewbachelor

Original source

Episode 1013: Chewbachelor

Conduits are sort of the general purpose “thing” to either go wrong or to have to fix on a spaceship. You could replace an entire spaceship combat hit location table with the following:

d% Location
1-100 Conduit
It’d be just as effective. Or for bonus points add the following:
d% Conduit type
1-4 Antimatter
5-8 Baryon
9-12 Entropy
13-16 Ferrofluid
17-20 Flux
21-24 Heisenfram
25-28 Hydraulic
29-32 Hydrocolloid
33-36 Hyperfluid
37-40 Intermix
41-44 Laser
45-48 Liquid helium
49-52 Liquid sodium
53-56 Microwave
57-60 Neutrino
61-64 Neutron beam
65-68 Non-Newtonian fluid
69-72 Phlebotinum
73-76 Plasma
77-80 Quasi-crystal
81-84 Steam
85-88 Superfluid
89-92 Tachyon
93-96 Vortex
97-100 Wavelet

What If the Next Presidential Limo Was a Tesla?

Original source cartechboy writes “The presidential limo is known as “The Beast,” and it’s getting to be about that time where it’s replaced. Currently The Beast is a General Motors creation with a Cadillac badge, but what if the next presidential limo was a Tesla? Stick with me here. The Beast is a massive vehicle, which means there would be plenty of room in the structure to have a long battery pack a la Model S. Plus, it could use the upcoming Model X’s all-wheel-drive system. Tesla’s air suspension would keep it from encountering high-centering issues. There could even be a charging port on both the front and back so a battery truck could hook up while driving, like in-flight refueling. Obviously the battery pack would need to have extra protection so it wouldn’t have any issues with road debris, but that’s a minor issue. Tesla is an American company, and that’s a requirement for The Beast. So is it that far fetched to think the next presidential limo could be a Tesla?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.









Google Flu Trends Gets It Wrong Three Years Running

Original source wabrandsma writes with this story from NewScientist: “Google may be a master at data wrangling, but one of its products has been making bogus data-driven predictions. A study of Google’s much-hyped flu tracker has consistently overestimated flu cases in the US for years. It’s a failure that highlights the danger of relying on big data technologies. Evan Selinger, a technology ethicist at Rochester Institute of Technology in New York, says Google Flu’s failures hint at a larger problem with the algorithmic approach taken by technology companies to deliver services we all want to use. The problem is with the assumption that either the data that is gathered about us, or the algorithms used to process it, are neutral. Google Flu Trends has been discussed at slashdot before: When Google Got Flu Wrong.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.









What if I wrote a book?

Original source

For the last couple years, I’ve been answering your science questions on What If.

Today, I’m excited to announce that the What If?book is coming!

What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questionswill be published September 2nd by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Starting today you can pre-order it from your favorite bookseller (Barnes & Noble,Amazon,Indie Bound). There are also foreign editions, including a UK and Commonwealth editionand a German edition.

As I’ve sifted through the letters submitted to What If every week, I’ve occasionally set aside particularly neat questions that I wanted to spend a little more time on. This book features my answers to those questions, along with revised and updated versions of some of my favorite articles from the site. (I’m also including my personal list of the weirdest questions people have submitted.)

Preorder today to get a copy as soon as it comes out!



Movie and TV GUIs: Cracking the Code

Original source rjmarvin writes “We’ve all seen the code displayed in hacking scenes from movies and TV, but now a new industry is growing around custom-building realistic software and dummy code. Twisted Media, a Chicago-based design team, started doing fake computer graphics back in 2007 for the TNT show Leverage, and is now working on three prime-time shows on top of films like Gravity and the upcoming Divergent. They design and create realistic interfaces and codebases for futuristic software. British computer scientist John Graham-Cumming has drawn attention to entertainment background code by explaining what the displayed code actually does on his blog, but now that the public is more aware, studios are paying for fake code that’s actually convincing.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.











Firefox OS Will Become the Mobile OS To Beat

Original source mattydread23 writes with an opinion piece naming a few reasons Firefox OS is likely to succeed “It’s geared toward low-powered hardware in a way that Google doesn’t care as much about with Android, it’s cheap enough for the pre-paid phones that are much more common than post-paid in developing countries, and most important, there are still 3.5 billion people in the world who have feature phones and for whom this will be an amazing upgrade.” I’d push greater commitment to keeping the essential components of the system under FOSS licenses onto the head of that list.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.









Microsoft’s Attempt To Convert Users From Windows XP Backfires

Original source MojoKid writes “Microsoft has been loudly and insistently banging a drum: All support and service for Windows XP and Office 2003 shuts down on April 8. In early February, faced with a slight uptick in users on the decrepit operating system the month before, Microsoft hit on an idea: Why not recruit tech-savvy friends and family to tell old holdouts to get off XP? The response … was a torrent of abuse from Windows 8 users who aren’t exactly thrilled with the operating system. Microsoft has come under serious fire for some significant missteps in this process, including a total lack of actual upgrade options. What Microsoft calls an upgrade involves completely wiping the PC and reinstalling a fresh OS copy on it — or ideally, buying a new device. Microsoft has misjudged how strong its relationship is with consumers and failed to acknowledge its own shortcomings. Not providing an upgrade utility is one example — but so is the general lack of attractive upgrade prices or even the most basic understanding of why users haven’t upgraded. Microsoft’s right to kill XP is unquestioned, but the company appears to have no insight into why its customers continue to use the OS. “

Read more of this story at Slashdot.